Arguing for Drug Testing Policy

This memo is in response to your recent e-mail in regards to random drug testing. I believe that implementing this policy would be extremely beneficial to our company as a whole. This is for the following reasons financial savings, workplace safety, and to keep abreast our reputation. Financial Savings It is important that we strive to prolong a safe and effective work environment for every single one of our employees.It is estimated that workplace accidents cerebrate to drugs have constitutes employers in the United States $75 to 100 billion dollars per year. Those who abuse are excessively six times more likely to deposit workers compensation claim and use 16 times the amount of health benefits as their fellow employees who do not use drugs. (http//www. employmentdrugtesting. com/screening. html_) Not ensuring that our employees are sober could end up costing our company a great deal of currency in the long run if an employee under the entrance injures themself or nother employee era on the Job here at Life Support, Inc.One might argue that implementing this drug-testing policy would actually cost our company more money due to the cost of the drug tests. However, the cost of a drug test cannot compare to the higher cost of workers compensation or lawsuits to this company that could dominancely occur due to an employee under the influence while on the Job. Spending money on these drug tests is a preventative measure to keep our company from spending more money in the long run. Workplace Safety It is absolutely vital that Life Support, Inc. rovides an environment in which our employees come to work knowing that we value their safety. The facts and figures mentioned above apprise that employees under the influence of drugs are extremely likely to cause and produce accidents in the workplace. The drug users are not the only ones at risk. Employees under the influence of drugs are clearly not performing to the best of their ability their impaired stat e can cause them to make careless mistakes or exercise woeful Judgment that they normally would not if they were in a ober state of mind.This can cause injury not only to them, but their fellow co- workers. By weeding pop out the employees who choose to use drugs, we will be providing a safer place for our workers and also show them that we truly value their safety. Maintain Reputation It is important for Life Support, Inc. to maintain a reputable image. By not tolerating drug abuse by our employees we present ourselves as a company that really cares about their people and also the quality of their products.https//donemyessay.com/unit-5-review/Our products will continue o be made of impeccable quality and be held to the highest standards in the industry. Our clients and those who use our products will know that Life Support, Inc. is a name to be trusted. This kind of quality and standards will reduce any possible liability for any malfunctioning equipment. I urge you to consider t he potential savings, workplace safety, and our reputation as you continue to make your decision in regards to this matter. As always, please feel free to contact me if I can be of any other assistance to you.

Mahabharata

ethics and Values Introduction Values argon the rules by which we make decisions about beneficial and wrong, should and shouldnt, good and bad. They also tell us which are more or less important, which is useful when we have to trade off meeting one value over another. Ethics tend to be systemise into a formal system or set of rules which are explicitly adopted by a group of people. Ethics, are how we actually do stick out in the face of difficult situations that test our moral fiber. It has been said that values, morals and ethics are inextricably tied together.Ethics and values deeply integrated in Mahabharata/Vidur Niti Mahabharata is considered as an encyclopedia of reference for human life. It is said to contain all that a man should know towards achieving the four human goals, Dharma (righteousness), Artha (human Endeavour towards material pursuits), Kama (desire) and Moksha (salvation). The Mahabharata is called the fifth part Veda as it contains the essence of the four Ve das. This encompasses a whole lot of knowledge in it, the like Vidura Neeti, Srimad Bhagwadgita etc. re a part of this scripture only. Vidur Niti by Mahatama Vidur is one of the prominent Niti Sastras containing ethical values, having relevance even for forthwith. Once Dritarastra,who was having a sleepless night, called Vidur to seek the way for solace.The preaching which Vidur delivered during that time and subsequently, in continuation, is even today known as Vidur Niti. It contains not only the fundamental principles and deep knowledge of politics, simply also deals greatly about ethics and values, i. e. ow should an administrator run his organization efficiently by following the DHARMA and not resorting to unfair means which are not in the benefit of the stakeholders. In todays modern focal point when ethical judgment and importance of recognizing the ethical dimensions is talked about, Mahabharat digs excellent analogies to identify the ethical boundaries. Rules of ethic al stock, dharmayuddha, for the war were framed by the supreme commanders of each side. Vidura explains codes of conduct and how one should act in different situations. His teachings are aimed at kings, ordinary citizens as well as at ascetics.Brief summary/story of Mahabharata enlightened with Ethics and Values Vidura respected his elder sidekick Dhrtrastra , and all along he tried to guide him on the right path. During the fratricidal war of Kuruksetra, Vidura repeatedly implored his elder brother Dhrtrastra to do justice to the sons of Pandu, but his son Duryodhana did not like such interference by his uncle Vidur, and rather practically insulted Vidura. Vidura was very prudent, wise, polite, religious, well- mannered and devoted to the entitle Krishna. As a minister to Dhrtarastra, he used to give him good advice.When Duryodhana was born, Vidur had cautioned him that his child would be the cause of the Kauravas destruction, but due to the attachment for his child, Dhritarasht ra did not take over heed to his advice and as a result suffered a lot all along his life just because of Duryodhana. Because of Duryodhanas atrocities, Mahatma Vidur developed sympathy for the Pandavas and he helped them and protected them like a shot or indirectly. He knew that despite any crisis, the Pandavas would win the battle eventually. They were blessed with a long life and hence no one could kill them.Kunti was persuade of Vidurs words as she knew that he was a man of truth. Vidur had also cautioned Yudhishtir of the imminent danger that was lurking in Barnavata and also told him the way to escape the danger. It was Vidur who had planned the digging of a tunnel from Lakshagriha to the bank of the Ganges and had arranged for the boat to emerge on the river and finally cross it. Thus, acting prudently, Vidur saved the lives of the Pandavas. Vidur did not discriminate in his adhesion for the Pandavas and the Kauravas and he used to give them good advice as well. notwithst anding Duryodhana never liked his advice. Even then, Vidur tried his level best to put Dritarastra on the right track. But under the influence of his sons, Dritarastra never followed Vidurs advice, although assuming him to be his well -wisher, he always sought his advice. Following Shakunis advice, Duryodhana informed the proposal of inviting the Pandavas over a patch of dice. Vidur cautioned Dritarastra that such a game would only increase the enmity between the two sides, as the game of dice was inauspicious for both the sides.Praising Vidur, Dritarastra then persuaded Duryodhana to give up the plan. But Duryodhana was determined to humiliate the Pandavas, hence he made Dritarastra accept his plan. Ultimately, it was Vidur who went to Indraprastha with the proposal of the game. Yudhishtir too did not like the game of dice but to honour his uncles desire, he accepted the proposal. Even when the game was being played, Vidur tried to convince Dritarastra that he keep mum had enough of time to come around and return his submissive stance for Duryodhana and save his clan and not to make the Pandavas their enemy.Again after the Pandavas had left for exile, Dritarastra was worried as to how to convince the subjects and how to please the Pandavas to return. Vidur then said O King, Artha, Dharma and Kama (wealth, religion and pleasure) are received through Dharma only. Dharma is the pedestal of the state. Hence, you should protect yourself and the Pandavas. Your sons have snatched everything from the Pandavas. It is against the Dharma. Hence, you should first get Duryodhana arrested and hand over the kingdom to Yudhishtir. Yudhishtir has no envy or jealousy, hence he will rule the kingdom religiously.Ask Dushasana to beg for pardon from Draupadi and Bheema in the court. Doing these things, you will be free from your worries. But Dritarastra did not like this advice and he told Vidur as to how he could give up his sons just for the Pandavas sake,and ordered Vidur to leave. Anticipating the imminent fall of the Kauravas, Vidur palavered Kamyaka Vana to meet the Pandavas and told them a few things for their benefit. Dritarastra having come to know of Vidurs visit to the Pandavas began to suspect that with the help of Vidur, the Pandavas would become stronger.So, he called Vidur back and begged him for pardon. At that Vidur told Dritarastra that he did not differentiate between the Kauravas and the Pandavas but seeing the Pandavas in such a hapless condition, it was but natural to help them, in any case, he did not have any partiality for the Kauravas. Vidura was also very loyal to professional Krishna. When Krishna came to Hastinapur with the peace proposal, he preferred to stay with Vidur relishing the plain food offered by him in contrast to the royal meal, which was being served at the palace.It is thus piano to guess the intense love of Lord Krishna for Vidur. Next day when Duryodhana tried to tie Krishna in the palace, Vidur cautioned him and told him that Shri Krishna is the Lord Himself and any kind of disrespect for him would destroy him like a flame destroys a moth. Thereafter the Lord appeared in his cosmic form and seeing which all except Vidur, Bheeshma, Sanjay and Drona closed their eyes. After the battle was over, Vidur consoled Dritarastra that whoever died in the battle had attained salvation, hence one should not mourn for them.Every time a human is born, he makes new relations but after his last these relations crumble like a castle made out of sand Hence, it is useless to mourn for the dead relatives. Events like comforts and miseries, crisis and fortune and chance etc. is due to the result of ones own good or bad deeds. Every living being has to bear the fruits of his deeds. Thereafter Vidur preached the ways of observing the right conduct and how to be rid of the miseries. After the coronation of Yudhishtir, Dritarastra came to stay with him.Vidur also stayed with him and used to be engaged in r eligious discussions. Eventually, he accompanied Dritarastra, Gandhari and Kunti in their penance. Conclusion From above epic/story/discussion, it will be observed that many gems of ethical values are contained in the Vidura Niti and in the Mahabharata as whole, which is still relevant in the modern times, when the degradation of ethical values has become rampant all around the world. Let us ponder over slightly of them to be more wise, prudent, and successful in the ultimate reckoning.

Jim Crow Laws Main Problems for Black Americans in the 1920s and 1930s Essay

When the Civil struggle ended in 1865, Abraham Lincoln proclaimed all work force in America dim or white meet. However, throughout the rest of the nineteenth and much of the twentieth century African-Americans were widely discriminated especially in the entropyern states of the country. They set about serious sociable, economic and political worrys and were regarded by most people as the inferior race.Although America was referred to by its president Woodrow Wilson as the great run pot in 1915 and although it was supposed to be a country where all men are created equal as stated in the Constitution this certainly was not the case. American parliamentary law was divided by strict racial hierarchy with the White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASP) on the very go across, separate European immigrants in the middle and with scurrilouss descending mainly from slaves on the very bottom. Historians indicate why this was and why the desires of some leaders to create a homologous nati on really stayed only if desires.Some argue that the ethnic minorities cased divergence in everyday life because it had efficacious basis in the so called Jim swash laws, which promoted the furcate scarce equal finding of the compulsory Court from 1896. These laws were introduced in the South to support the separation of the races and essentially made the discrimination of Blacks legal. However, early(a)s argue that the reason for discrimination lay deeper in the American history and that it grow from the established racial hierarchy.There were many half-secret organisations that fought for the white subordination and some historians, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as David M. Chalmers argue that it was the strainations of such groups that caused the discrimination against blacks. Some historians also argue that the federal apathy was another important parapet blacks had to governing body. This was because of the laissez-faire policy and also because of personal ra cialist views held by the presidents of the era, who wanted (as the rest of American people) to take hold power in the hands of the WASP establishment.Some other historians would argue that it was the impact of beingness War One that deepened the racial problems and others believe that blacks had to deal with discrimination because of the alarm of the whites that their sociable and economic status were beneath threat. This essay will examine all those possible reasons why black people were treated with dislike in the interwar period and will prove that while the Jim Crow laws were important in justifying this approach it was in fact the deep-rooted racialism that caused all the other factors and led to the savage discrimination of African-Americans.Some historians, such as John A. Kerr argue that the Jim Crow laws were the main cause of the discrimination commit in American states. The decision of the Supreme Court in 1896 led to proliferation of these laws throughout the So uth as Homer Plessy confused his case and the Court found that the laws were not breaking the US Constitution. The Court decided to support the quotidian Separate but Equal policy, which meant that as long as equal facilities were provided, the segregation of the races wasn? unconstitutional. Seven of the viii justices at the trial favoured this decision and stated that the 14th Amendment to the US constitution was not intended to extinguish distinctions based upon colour and that separation of those does not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other. This decision disappointed black people as they knew that it was very unlikely that the states would provide them with equal facilities.As a result of this case states could impose legal punishments on people consorting with members of another race. The most common examples of Jim Crow laws were forbidding intermarriage and ordering business owners and public institutions (schools, offices) to keep their blac k and white clientele separate. Basically, the discrimination of black Americans was now legal. The only justice that didn? t agree with the court? s decision, John Harlan, summarised it intumesce stating the present decision ill not only stimulate aggressions, more or less barbarous and irritating, upon the admitted rights of coloured citizens, but will encourage the belief that it is possible, by means of state enactments, to defeat the right purposes which the people of the United States had in view when they adopted the recent (13th and 14th) amendments of the Constitution. In addition, even though black people possessed the right to vote, by the year 1902 there was only 3,000 black voters in aluminum as it was whiz of the states that created impossible qualification tests for black voters.In a state where African-American macrocosm was significant with around 900,000 individuals this isn? t surprising and only proves the extent of discrimination and racism present. These ridiculous tests, with questions such as How many bubbles are in a bar of soap denied blacks the opportunity to vote for their politicians and then decreased the chances of a change of the situation. The Jim Crow laws were clearly a manifestation of the racism present indoors American culture, but they al 1 weren? t the reason for the hostility and discrimination towards the blacks.The factor that caused the laws to come into organism and be conveyed and followed was the deep-rooted racism and the presumed dominance of the WASPs and this was the main problem African-Americans had to deal with. Many historians would thusly argue that the main reason why ethnic minorities and blacks in particular, faced discrimination was the existence of racial hierarchy and deep-rooted racism inherent within the American WASP culture. afterward the 13th Amendment in 1865 that freed the author black slaves and the 14th and 15th Amendments that provided them with equal rights and suffrage, Afri can-American hoped for a new better beginning.However, the former slave-owners and other WASPs living especially in the south were not willing to undergo such change. The problem wasn? t only with blacks, other ethnic groups different from the white acceptable Americans of northern European origin suffered from discrimination and perceived inferiority as well. Americans wanted to keep their standard of WASP Americanism and were unwilling to accept other cultures as equal. There were many pseudo-scientific findings that were meant to prove this inequality.Joseph Le Conte, an American anthropologist, for example claimed that modern ethnologists go for thoroughly established the fact that in all essential qualities the Negro race seems to be all told incapable of development. Racial stereotypes of blacks as inferior beings were popular throughout American society and although the racial hierarchy was mostly unspoken, there were clear signs of it in every aspect of the culture. As the blacks were always regarded as inferior, low-class people, it was not easy for the white supremacy supporters to all of a sudden support their equality.racialism had a strong historical context in American society and it was this that caused the Jim Crow laws to be legalised and supremacist organisations, such as the Ku Klux Klan, to form. Therefore the deep-rooted racism must be seen as the happen upon problem Blacks had to face as it caused all the other obstacles for them and resulted in discrimination in all levels of the society. However, some historians would argue that it was the existence of the supremacist organisations that posed the biggest trouble to the black Americans.Ku Klux Klan was formed immediately after the end of the Civil War but its main wave of actions happened during the 1920s and 30s. The founder of the second KKK, who awoke the old tradition in 1915, was William J. Simmons. His aim was to upchuck Southern culture of corrupting influences that were accor ding to him trying to destroy WASP America. These were apparently not only blacks, but also other ethnic and religious groups, such as Catholics, Jews and even communists. The Klan used unpeaceful methods to intimidate and suppress these groups.Mob violence and lynching were a daily fact of life in the south during the 1920s. However, the organisation became gradually more national with members in the northern countries as well as in the southern ones. It restricted its membership to native-born white Protestants and it attracted many people due to blacks? migration and genial fears resulting from it many people across the country became committed to the 100% Americanism and were afraid of losing the smudge on the top of the racial hierarchy. As historian Paul S.Boyer states, The organisation consisted primarily of ordinary people, not criminals or fanatics. The Klan? s promise to restore the nation to an imagined purity ethnical, moral and religious appealed powerfully to ill -educated and deeply religious Americans. By 1925 KKK had 5 million members and it dominated state legislatures. Assembly men, sheriffs, judges all were members of the Klan and agreed with its policies, either secretly or publicly. The Klan used symbols, such as white robes and burning crosses to bring about and emphasise fear and as historian David M.Chalmers argues they were viewed as a super-secret organisation masked and mysterious, with a tradition of violence for which a generation of legend had achieved a high measure of companionable approval. They were feared by the blacks and praised by the whites. Although the white supremacy organisations, such as the KKK played an important role in supporting racist actions and discrimination, they didn? t exist without a cause. This cause was the deep-rooted racism within American people as well as the social and economic fear after the Great Migration and the First World War.It is also surprising that such a violent organisation w as free to carry out its actions and was not stopped by incomplete federal, nor state governments. This shows that the legal aspect of discrimination was to a great extent the major problem for the blacks. However, racism would have existed without the laws, but the laws would not have existed without the deep-rooted racism in American culture, which establishes it as the key reason for all the problems. In any other instance, organisations such as the KKK and racist laws such as the Jim Crow laws would not be accepted by any government.Thus, historians debate also the option that one of the biggest problems African Americans had to face during this time period was the federal government? s apathy. By the ruling of the Supreme Court in 1876 it has been decided that individual states could govern themselves as they saw fit. This led to proliferation of the Jim Crow laws in the South and increasing ignorance of the problem of discrimination in the North. What is more, it provided the federal government with an excuse to not inject and carry out the ineffective laissez-faire policy.Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat president during and after the First World War, was even racist himself. He declared that the blacks were an ignorant and inferior race and strongly defended segregation stating in 1916 that it is not humiliating and is a benefit to you Black gentlemen. Even though he is known for his bowel movement for international brotherhood and peace and he denounced the tactics of the KKK, he openly sympathised with its efforts to restore the white supremacy. Clearly, the racism in America was deep-rooted in all levels of the society.In the 1920s Republicans held the presidential office in their hands and as part of their overall approach to ruling they applied the laissez-faire attitude towards social affairs. As Calvin Coolidge stated the chief business of the American people is business. They simply did not entail it was their job to intervene in people? s every day lives. Moreover, the various administrations seemed to close their eyes to racial discrimination. Anti-lynching law in 1921 was never passed as it was defeated by Southern Senators and that meant that the organisations such as the KKK could go along with their horrible actions.What is more, the Klan was allowed to organise 40,000 men march on Washington DC in 1925 showing its long suit and being de facto supported by the federal government. Blacks were also further excluded from the Republican Party and had to submit to segregation in the White House and the federal civil service. The evidence shows that Blacks were discriminated in all levels of the society. Even the presidents themselves were racist and did nothing to tackle the inequalities, if not making them worse.The federal apathy clearly rooted from the racism present among the public and the government was simply responding to the will of the people. This created further complications for the African Americans to gain their civil rights as they had to face racism and discrimination not only at everyday levels but also at the correct political ones. Historians also debate the possibility that the aftermath of WW1 causing the Great Migration and wide spread social and economic fears was itself the reason for discrimination of black Americans.In the WW1, many African-Americans fought for the country, but even more of them were utilise in munitions, other factories and agriculture to keep the country going. As a result, many blacks moved from the South to the North as they saw it as a chance for better life. Whites didn? t always take in these migrants as they, too, had racism deep in their minds. Black migrants were also seen as an unwanted job ambition in 1917 in St. Louis 40 blacks and 9 whites were killed in race riot over employment.Although discrimination was nowhere near legal as it was in the South with the Jim Crow laws, whites in the North considered themselves superior as well and wer e ready to defend their position on the racial hierarchy. In Chicago, race riots began when a black boy accidentally swam to white only waters and the respectable white American citizens present on the beach stoned him to death. As Willoughby and Willoughby argue, This incident clearly indicates the depth and extent of the hatred and prejudice. And it indeed does.As shown above, the KKK had huge number of supporters and members in the North as well ever since its reformation and this meant that even the blue WASPs were ready to discriminate. This leads back to the deep-rooted racism in the American culture and indicates it as the key problem. After the war ended, the closings of munitions factories hugely affected large proportion of the population. Blacks were then used as strike-breakers and were accused of take down the wages as they were willing to work for less money.This, of course, created tensions and caused the native white Americans to feel their economic and social sta tus being genuinely under threat. However, this attitude towards African-Americans was nothing new. On balance, there have been Klan members and other WASPs discriminating previous to the war, but the Great Migration caused by northern agents recruiting black workers in the South for munitions factories and other jobs, significantly increased the hostility towards blacks and heated the already existing racial tensions.It also gave further reasons to the ordinary white workers to support or join the Klan. Overall, there was no legal basis for discrimination in the north of the country, but the deep-rooted racism causing de facto segregation of the races provided strong enough reason for the racist Americans to discriminate. The black Americans faced serious problems of discrimination as they were regarded as members of the inferior race during the 19th and most of the 20th century. During the 1920s the tensions increased as the African Americans began to migrate within the US.Jim Cro w laws made it legal to discriminate in the south as they sought segregation of the races and indirectly approved the white supremacy. This, on board with federal government unwillingness to do anything about them, made it possible for racist organisations, such as the KKK, to exist and promote the WASP superiority through violence. However, the view that the KKK itself was the cause of racism is over simplistic misconception as it would not exist and be widely supported if the people would not agree with its goals.In addition, the impact of the First World War which meant increase in black migration to the North caused further heighten of racial problems there and was a factor in the increasing tensions. The problem black Americans faced was discrimination. This was possible to a great extent due to its de jure legalisation in the Jim Crow laws, but in echt fact the main problem blacks faced was the established racial hierarchy within the American society and the deep-rooted raci sm present in majority of the people.Simply, Blacks were denied to vote, federal government refused to do anything about their hapless treatment and the Ku Klux Klan successfully managed to question their equality by themselves. However, all these actions taken by the WASPs to secure their position were but a manifestation of a wider racist attitude that was deep-rooted in the culture. In last(a) conclusion, Jim Crow laws were a problem for the black Americans in the 1920s and 30s, but it was not the main one as they had to deal with the deep-rooted racism first to get rid of their discrimination completely.

Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams An the Statesn View of the Stamp Act Samuel Adams writes a letter to his English friend, tail end Smith, defending the Americans side of the new imperial appraiseation and control. He describes the colonists thinking of the get along as both burdensome and unconstitutional. They feel as if they are not represented as they should be and that their rights as Englishmen are being taken away from them. He goes on to say that Parliament cannot tax them consistent with the constitution because they are not represented. In 1765 England passed a new law called the Stamp Act.This run was meant to replace the sugar act because that act did not work. It taxed all printed items. England felt that they call fored to tax the colonies because the colonies were stock-still a part of England and felt that they needed to help pay for the debt that they were in for the war that they had helped fight for the colonies. asa dulcis Franklin proposed that if England was to tax the colon ies, then they wanted members in the legislature so they could be one community. However, politicians rejected this musical theme and called Franklin a radical.England felt like the colonies were already represented enough because they had virtual representation and didnt need to have geographic representation. England said that geographic representation would cost them too much time and just any laws would be passed. In this letter Adams says England is increasing their power and wealth at the colonies expense. He argues against the stoppage that England makes saying that the war was to defend the colonies, saying that England didnt do it for the colonies, but to a greater extent for advancing their convention and glory.Samuel Adams had a bias towards the American side. Originally the audience was his friend John Smith. However, since this letter has been published it is more aimed towards the English because it is refuting their side of the Stamp Act and how they thought of it . Samuel Adams is trying to get his point across that he and the rest of America feel under represented. I think that the meaning of this document is to let people know that there is just more than one side to the different acts that England was passing.There was an English side as well as an American side. The point was to show us the different views of each side, and help us realize that it was more of a misunderstanding rather than England scatty to take all control, and America wanting to break away from England. I think that one of the biggest misconceptions most people get from these different acts that last led to the revolution, was that America wanted to separate from England. However, this wasnt the case. America actually wanted to stay a part of the English Empire.America and England just could never see eye to eye, for example how each of them saw Americas representation. This letter helped me better understand why this all these small acts eventually led up to the Ame rican revolution. It made me realize that a lot of history is bias. Usually people only go out or read somewhat one side of things and dont really think about listening to the other side. To really understand history and better understand why something happened the way it did, its better to study each side of it.

Motivations and Benefits of Students Volunteering

Essa Fadhili S363053517/1/2018Teachers(s) Name Sharene Herdy & Rachel JoyAbstractThe following report examines the pointors that motivate bookmans to take piece in extending run away. The tack largely draws its insights from an American Education Research ledger and a peer reviewed article from Swedens Linnacus University. The goal is to yield findings on what motivates university students into engaging in extend work, the report offers several ideas for recommendations.The report provides concise findings on what motivates students into pickings part in declare oneselfing work.IntroductionVolunteering is a necessary part of the society as it is associated with numerous benefits for both the progressive and passive participants. While this fact remains, many students are usually unwilling to participate in volunteering syllabus for varied reasons.Some lack motivating factors since the work is free while early(a)s do not get by volunteer to be important or of any meaningf ul use to the society. Most universities score for great encouraged their students to take up volunteering work. Through volunteering, students gain from experience.For instance, they help give back to the society by helping the disadvantaged and improve their cordial skills. The report aims to discuss the motives of volunteering. In doing so, the benefits that students can derive from dynamic in volunteer work will be reviewed. The benefits include meeting new people, acquiring utilizable skills, and learning the importance of creating community awareness active certain social gaps.The piece will also provide recommendations to help to universities promote the program to the participants. The piece largely draws its insights from an American Education Research Journal and a peer reviewed article from Swedens Linnacus University.Motivations for Student to do Volunteer WorkOne of the motivations that encourage students to engage in volunteer work is the need to meet new peopl e and help their cause.The Students make new friends with others like them from other faculties or schools which serves to improve their social actions for students engaging in volunteer work provides them with the opportunity to meet strangers and have a positive impact on their lives. Research indicates that 74% of students who were actively involved in volunteer work experienced broader social ties and friendships (Fermnadez, Linett, and Nomoto 2016).It is easier for students with similar interests to interact that it is the case within the campus. As can be seen in the figure below, the image of volunteers in the University age bracket is still very low and gum olibanum the need to encourage students to enrol.Figure-12.Benefits of Volunteer WorkAnother important motivation that lures students into being part of volunteer work is the fact that they develop useful skills and work experience.In the process of helping with volunteer work, students can learn mixed professional sk ills that can assist them with their future career and their resume. Research indicates that 51% of fresh graduates in physical exertion began working in volunteering programs (Serow1991). Volunteering comes with a sense of happiness and self-fulfillment thus enticing students to take part in such programs. Also, 39% of non-volunteer students strongly believe volunteering in their academic course can captivate them to engage in volunteer work (Serow1991).Volunteer work can act as an lucky route to employment more so where the work involved relates to the course the participants are taking in the University.Feeling of Happiness in Helping PeopleThe other motivation that student can gain from volunteering work is the sensation of happiness in helping others.The participants make a social difference that they feel proud of and that acts as a motivational factor to engage in volunteer work (Serow 1991). The feeling that one is making a meaningful contribution to the society and orga nizations that address the social plight of the society is enough motivation to encourage students to take part in more volunteer program. Everyone likes to be part of a pregnant social change, and volunteer work offers this chance to the student.Figure-2The above figure illustrates the sharp decline in the number of volunteer between 2002 and 2015.ConclusionTo sum up, different motivations can serve to encourage more students to engage in volunteering program. Engaging in volunteer work provides students with an opportunity to improve their chances of employability.What is more, students get to meet new students with similar interests. Lastly, students feel happy helping others and that lures them into volunteer programs.RecommendationsTo encourage more student to join the volunteering program the university should lift events where student volunteers can meet to share their experiences. Organizing such forums can both fulfill the need for students to socialize and act as a motiv ation for more students to engage in the volunteer program.Young people are thrill seekers and meeting new friends to share their experiences-both animatenesss and those from the program-can help boost the number of students joining the volunteer program. The events should have fun activities that students love such as music, famous artists, and food. . The University should organize short courses where experienced student volunteers can showcase their experience by teaching potential members the benefits of enrolling.This adds to their skills and employability. Such courses have a graduate(prenominal) chance of succeeding since it involves students teaching students unlike an outsider or a teacher doing so. The new lanners would be in a better position to learn from their colleagues who also share their experiences of the program.A youngster encouraging another is more efficient than an older party teaching the same to a youngster. . Another effective recommendation that would serve to attract more students to the volunteer program would be the use of flyers, adverts, and colorful videos about the pleasant experience of students in the volunteer program. Young people are always attracted to interesting videos and adverts as they form part of their daily lives on social media.Through sharing the videos and adverts, students improve their social life as they meet other new interested parties. As such, using these tools may be the or so effective way to reach to potential student-volunteers4 who are not already in the program. Videos, flyers, and ads may work better than word of mouth.Most campus students spend more time on the Internet than they do when they interact with each other. As such, it is easier for new volunteers to find the information about the volunteer program from popular social sites that from friends.Reference listFemandez, P Linett, Q Nomoto, T 2016, student volunteering in Sweden and the motivations driving this phenomenon Bachelor The sis,Linnacus University ,Sweden.Serow, R, C 1991, Students and voluntarism looking into the motives of community expediency participantsAmerican Educational Research Journal, vol.28, No.3, pp 543-556.

The Basis of Economics

lacquer has per sorted a miracle. The countrys economical performance following its crushing defeat in World War II is nothing defraud of astounding. The economic expansion of Japan is second to none. All of the elements are in place for Japan to restrain increasing its share of the worlds wealth as Americas gradually declines. The country is on track to becoming the worlds largest economy. How did Japan do it? There are many theories and studies that have traced the Nipponese miracle without success.The answer to the mystery can by examining Japans culture, didactics, and employment dodge. Japans success is not just a case of goodly technique and technology in transaction, but a real recognition and development of the necessary gentle skills. A better judgment of the Nipponese society provides the framework to understanding the workings of Japanese business (and possibly the Japanese mind. ) The ayes of the Japanese provide a foundation for their economic adaptability in modern times.Japan is a culture where humankind relations and preservation of harmony are the most important elements in society. It is their sense of identity and destiny, which gives their industrial, machines its effectiveness. Among the Japanese, thither exists an instinctive respect for institutions and government, for the rules of etiquette and service, for social functions and their rituals of business. Japan is a traditionally herd island the bulk are hale to share the limited space with each other and to live in harmony.The Japanese are very protective of their culture. They are very conservative to outside intrusion. Their distinctive ways are a ascendent of pride and national strength. Japans striving for purity is very different form a coupling American idea of open doors and diversity as strength. Accordingly, one of the main sources of Japans strength is its peoples willingness to sacrifice, to be regimented and homogenized, and to repress personal desires to t he harmony of the working group. The Japanese people have had to become a group-oriented society.While in the western world, individuality and independence are highly valued, Japanese society emphasizes group activity and organization. The people accept that they will belong to one social group and work for one company for life. The crowded island conditions have driven society to value conformity. The culture that Japanese people are brought up in causes them to recognize that they have to work together to succeed. Only harmony will provide improvement. This development of the human nature and attitude relates directly to Japans business practice and provides a basis for good business relations.Japans education system has grabbed the worlds attention as it is specifically designed to teach the children skills and aptitudes to give them an edge in the business world. The educational system, based on the principle of full equality of educational opportunity, is widely recognized as h aving greatly contributed to the prosperity of Japan by providing a highly qualified work force supplemented by extensive in training programs by many of the major employers. The primary and secondary educational system is probably the most comprehensive and most disciplined in the world.Where North American students attend condition 175 days a year, Japanese students attend 240 days. Japanese students attend elementary and secondary civilise six days a week and for two months longer each year than North American students. In addition, they have long hours of homework. A large majority of Japanese students attend Juki, or preceding(prenominal) schools, in the evenings and on Sundays.In higher education, while lacking the strong University system which exists in North America, the curriculum is equally rigorous, and Japan is graduating 75 000 engineers per year, 3 000 more than the U. S. , from a University population one twenty percent the size. The education system itself is a unifying force. It molds children into group oriented beings by demanding uniformity and conformity form the earliest ages. The attainment of excellence within this complex environment, and the importance it holds for ones future is stressed early. This emphasis places a great burden on the young to perform well in school a to get ahead admittance to high status universities.The public school system not only produces good, obedient citizens, it produces good workers. A willingness to give oneself to the corporations best interest, to arrive early and stay late, and to produce good work is attributes versed in the Japanese schools. Those who cannot learn these skills do not do well in school or do not rise in the ranks of the corporate world. The education system is an excellent example of how the Japanese recognize and develop the necessary human skills that are needed in society and stressed in the business world.

Slave Narratives

During the times of striverry many pot opposed the thought of forcing someone to do everything they say, to avow someone. They believed in the freedom of others and to treat everyone equ tout ensembley. There were many abolitionists and slave narratives who wanted their side of the story to be heard. auntie Harriet Smith was a grisly woman from Homestead Texas and Aunt Phoebe Boyd from Dunnsville Virginia, both slave narratives. Aunt Harriet Smith was married to Jim Smith. They white folks killed her husband and she never knew why they would do such(prenominal) a thing, he was an honest man who went to church and constantly did what he was told (Soul, 2003).During one of her interviews Harriet was asked how long past she could commend from her slave days, she could remember all the way back when she was thirteen years old. Harriet could successfully remember everyones names as well, all the white children, her owner, everyone of the slaves she was around, and people she came i nto contact with on a incessant basis. Her owner had first purchased her grandmother and from then on owned the rest of her family from there on strike down. unrivalled thing she was extremely faithful to was church.They allowed the white people to go to church in the morning and the black people were allowed to go at night. They had a white preacher and he was always telling them to stomach themselves. If the black slaves were to act up then the preacher would tell there owners and they would be punished. She believed that there was a God, and he would help them. The slaves were never taught to read and write, the only gossip they had was the stories they heard during church near slaves macrocosm mistreated.This was something all the slaves would talk about when they seen each other and were able to communicate and talk. Harriet said that the white people were good to them. Her owner never hurt any of them. Her owner treated her well and whenever her and her family would hear about slaves being mistreated it would shock them. They felt bad for the slaves that were being abused. At one point in her interview she was asked why she went by Aunt Harriet Smith and she said by putting the word Aunt in front of her name was a sign of respect, and people respected her.During the Civil War, she could remember academic session with her two cousins on the white picket fence just watching the vehicles driving up and down the road. They loved the white picket fence and their owner didnt care if they say there. They would watch the soldiers all day long walk up and down the road. One of the reasons they loved watching so oftentimes because all the soldiers were colored soldiers (Smith, 1941). During the whole interview Aunt Harriet Smith was very optimistic, she always hoped for the best and didnt really have anything to say that was too negative.Even when she talked about her husband being killed, the only thing she unbroken talking about was how good of a man he was. She never turned the conversation into a negative one. Aunt Phoebe Boyd was also a slave narrative. She was very fond of the Lord and always believed that something better was coming. Smith, Harriet. Voices from the thralldom Days. The Liberty of Congress. N. p. , n. d. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. . Soul. AFRICAN-AMERiCAN SLAVE Aunt Harriet Smith On Church, Slavery & Punishment. YouTube. YouTube, 24 Apr. 2009. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. .